In accordance with clause 3.4 of the constitution: The President,
Vice Presidents and Honorary Treasurer for the ensuing year shall be
Members of the Institution and shall be elected by the Council. Their
election shall be announced at the Council Meeting of the Institution
immediately preceding the Annual General Meeting.
At the Council meeting held on 7th November 2007 the following members
were elected to serve council for 2008:
President: Chris Schnehage
Immediate Past President: Vaughan Townsend
Senior Vice President: Jack Cunnington
Vice President: Obed Letsholo
Honorary Treasurer: Robbie Holmwood
Elected Council members:
Keith Potter
Klaus Schönteich
Du Toit Grobler,
Andre du Plessis,
Rob Higgo,
Ian Buchanan
Branch Chairpersons:
Klerksdorp District Branch
Rustenburg District Branch
Western Cape Branch
KwaZulu-Natal Branch
Free State Branch
Eastern Cape Branch
Central Branch
The financial situation of ICMEESA remains sound with the financial
year of 2007 ending on a positive note. Thank you to our members for
their prompt payment of subscriptions which, combined with good control
of expenditure by the secretary, has resulted in us ending with a
surplus of funds. We have managed to maintain this healthy trend for the
past few years. Subscription income is our main source of income with
the only other income being interest from investments, and income from
the WP Jones Bursary Trust Fund. The financial statements will be
submitted to the auditors for presentation at the Annual General Meeting
in 30 March 2008.
The operational expenditure includes a total of R24 000 which is paid to
branches as a percentage of annual subscriptions received from members
of that specific branch. This is to assist the branches with the
expenditure incurred in running branch activities. Due to the ongoing
positive response from members for prompt subscription payment,
subscription increases for 2008 will be minimised. Still to be ratified
by council at the time of going to print, the subscription increase will
not exceed 4%, which equates to a R21 increase for Members and Senior
Members.
The proposed subscription for 2008 is:
There has been a continued positive trend by breaking a new record in
2007 for new membership figures for the previous number of years. A
total of 66 new members were recruited in 2007. Considering the number
of engineers emigrating and the reducing numbers of engineers in the
gold mining industry, this is an encouraging trend.
The membership graph displays the number of members that “joined” that
specific year, with the adjacent bar on the right displaying the number
of members from that years recruiting, which are paid up members as at
December 2007. Taking the members recruited in 2001. A total of seven
are no longer paid up members. One member resigned, while the other six
are reflected on our database as “lost”. We record members as “lost’
when we are unable to contact the member. This normally occurs when
members fail to update their contact details when changing employers or
relocating.
The “lost” member problem is also exacerbated by subscription payments
being made without the correct reference number being used. The
reference number shown on the invoice is the member’s membership number,
preceded by the year invoiced. This mostly occurs when payments are made
on behalf of the member by his employer without using the correct
reference number. Certain companies make bulk payments on behalf of a
group of members. In this case, the secretary will have difficulty in
associating the payment to the specific member. We request members to
have the employer fax or mail a remittance note to ICMEESA, listing the
names of the members paid for, if they are unable to use our requested
reference number.
Members are encouraged to regularly update their contact details on our
website at www.icmeesa.com. New members can also sign on by completing
the online application form which takes a few minutes to complete.
Should a member wish to resume membership, as a result of having lost
contact due to omission to update his address, Council will review
continued membership without the member having to pay arrears
subscriptions.
Members are reminded that ICMEESA does have a bursary scheme for
student studying mechanical or electrical engineering. Although
bursaries are not restricted to our members’ families, they will be
given favorable consideration. Bursary application forms can be obtained
on the website, or, from the secretary.
Council will review the continued support for bursars depending on the
results achieved for the past year. Previous bursars have received
support for the entire course. Should the bursar not perform
academically the continued bursary will for obvious reasons be reviewed
by council.
The bursary covers the costs of tuition, books and other associated cost
with approval of council.
Certificated Engineers -
Member feedback (in response to the article in the July newsletter:)
Dear Chris:
I would like to thank Niresh for writing the letter and you for
publishing it with your reply.
Living in the comfort of the UK for the past 5 years, it would be
inappropriate for me to comment on the first part of Niresh's letter,
suffice to say that not withstanding the 'truths' Niresh refers to,
these are perceptions. Unfortunately perceptions are the 'realities' of
life. As you rightly point out at the end of your reply; letters such as
Niresh's should inspire thought and action. Every Certificated Engineer
who read the letter and reply should be asking themselves "What should I
be personally doing in the workplace to change these perceptions?" and
"What can I do for ICMEESA and the profession to that will change the
perceptions?"
The second half of Niresh's letter reminds me of the letter a wrote a
couple of years ago in reply to a suggestion that the Certificated
Engineer was no longer required and only existed because of outdated
legislation and perhaps job protection and reservation. At the time I
said that the Certificated Engineer was endanger of extinction because
our safety education is purely limited to regulation and compliance. I
suggested that the Certificated Engineer should be educated on the
management systems and techniques that will ensure continual improvement
and compliance. As a Certificated Engineer and a GMR 2.1 appointee who
attended a couple of NOSA (now defunct) courses I thought I knew all
about safety.
Unfortunately, this assumption appears to be one that is widely held
throughout South Africa and is perhaps the root of some of the safety
issues the country has. I was transferred to the UK as the Occupational
Safety Manager for Europe Middle East and Africa in 2002. In my new job
I was dealing with real safety professionals and required to influence
high level managers on the appropriate strategies that would reduce risk
and improve safety performance. I soon realised I knew enough about
safety to be dangerous and I needed to get a proper safety education. I
enrolled for an MSc Occupational & Environmental Health & Safety
Management at University of Portsmouth. I still have my thesis to write,
but in July this year I became a Chartered Member of the Institution of
Occupational Safety & Health. The ten items Niresh requests are included
in most Bachelor's and Master's programs in safety. They are also key
components of Environment Health and Safety (EHS) Management systems.
They are out of scope of the GCC and most of the NOSA type courses.
South Africa and its businesses are often criticized for their appalling
safety record. Recently in the UK business press, Anglo American was
specifically criticized on its safety and that safety performance and
the reduction of fatalities would be a key priority for Cynthia Carroll
the new CEO. I recently made a presentation to ORC International members
in Washington USA about the safety challenges for businesses in Africa.
My background research for my presentation revealed that the SA
Institute of Safety Management (SAISM) had 500 members and the SA
Institute for Occupational Hygiene (SAIOH) had only 200 members at the
time. There were less than 900 Certificated Engineers in 2006. The other
consideration is the geographical dispersion of these members which
inhibits networking and the exchange of knowledge and experience.
So, to build on Niresh's comment about the absence of safety articles I
would ask, "Who's going to write them?" Niresh is vocalizing that there
is a dire need for education in these areas. It would be fair to say
that Niresh is probably looking for this subject matter in order to
educate himself and therefore it would be a bit unfair to ask "How many
articles have you submitted?"
So here's a couple of questions: "What can ICMEESA, SAISM and SAIOH
collaborate on to address the needs highlighted by Niresh". "What
technical articles can the individual members of ICMEESA, SAISM and
SAIOH submit to start educating our members?"
With this in mind, perhaps we should discuss this further and see what I
can do to pass my experience on to people like Niresh who need this help
through the compilation of technical articles.
Sincerely,
Peter S Knopp Pr. Cert. Eng. CMIOSH
Editors Comment - on Certificated Engineers -
feedback
I must apologize for the lack of a newsletter in September.
Unfortunately a combination of work pressures and washing your memory
stick, made it impossible to publish in time. From experience, and now
being an expert in this subject, I can advise that the latter option of
cleaning the memory stick is not advised. Inserting the memory stick
into the PC and either formatting or deleting the files is the preferred
option and promotes longer life. Not to detract from the effectiveness
of the washing soap manufacturer, the product does clean as effectively
as advertised. Nothing left on disc after recovery.
Member feedback received on articles published in this newsletter is
encouraging. The intent of this newsletter was more to encourage
membership participation and to be publishing extracts or articles from
members, expressing their views, as opposed to me writing personal
comment on the various subjects. So I appeal to members to put finger to
keyboard and express your views; opinions or questions to us. The last
newsletter, July, contained an article that appeared in Vector magazine,
from which I received the above response. Thanks you Peter for the
positive conclusion.
I was particularly interested in the reference to “safety education
being purely limited to regulation and compliance.”
It is unfortunate that we have this contradiction of regulation and
compliance contradicting everything we learn in the motivational
textbooks about thinking out of the box. Unfortunately it will be
difficult to distinguish between responsible and well researched change
and irresponsible gay abandon resulting in disaster. The result is that
both regulators and engineers are reluctant to change anything, as our
systems inherently make it onerous to do so. It becomes preferable to
leave an outdated procedure in place and let the operator bear the
consequences of not strictly adhering to it, however onerous it may be
for him.
Also, a comment with reference to the writing the articles. I agree that
written articles and papers are a sound source of reference to the new
engineer. But where and how does he source them? This Institution should
be the conduit through which engineers have access to this wealth of
information. Our sister organizations, involved with the mines,
traditionally published a bound hardcover edition of all the papers
presented during the previous year. Let me confess, they did nothing
more than adorn my bookshelf for years and were rarely referred to. I
recently handed these volumes over to a promising junior engineer so I
trust that they are now put to good use. The modern engineer will
preferably surf the internet for the necessary information before
laboriously searching the library. So our website should be a good
source of information from engineers willing to contribute.
I believe that most value is gained by young engineers actually writing
the article, paper, or presentation, than by reading what others have
done. The lack of papers or presentations from members is an all too
common complaint from all professional and voluntary associations. Let
me confess, those I have done over the years, excluding one, were as a
result of some gentle persuasion from my superiors. How do we stimulate
a different culture?
Getting more branch activity from members is perhaps the key. Any
comments from members on what needs to change to achieve that will be
welcome and stimulate an interesting debate.