| |
Extracts from
the
Twenty Second Annual General Meeting held on 28 February 2006 and the Annual Report for the year ended 31
December 2006.
|
-
Presidents
Review 2006: Vaughan Townsend
-
Presidents Address:
Continued Professional Development - Chris Schnehage
-
Composition of ICMEESA Council
-
Engineering Council of South Africa (ECSA)
-
SAASTA
-
Department of labour
-
Department
of Minerals and Energy
-
Finance Report for 2006
-
ICMEESA Membership
-
Editorial
-
Bursary Awards
|
|
Presidents Review:
Vaughan Townsend
In accordance with Clause 4.03 of the Constitution, the
Council has pleasure in presenting the Ninety-sixth Annual
Report and Financial Statement for the year ended 31
December 2006.
The year 2006 has come and gone with a tremendous amount of
time, energy and work being done by all EXCO and Council
members. This annual report has been compiled with the
intention of giving a brief outline and update on the key
events and issues of the past year and in no way reflects
all that was accomplished.
It has once again been an honour and a pleasure for me to
serve this esteemed Institution as President for the past
year. Allow me therefore to report on some of the highlights
and duties of the President.
As President, representing the Institution, I was invited to
numerous annual general meetings, banquets and workshops
hosted by other prestigious voluntary Institutions and
Associations. When I was not available, Obed Letsholo and
DuToit Grobler represented the Institution without
hesitation for which I am very grateful.
Other official activities include the Presidents Forum
hosted by ECSA, the Council for the Built Environment (CBE)
sub committee, various South African National Standards
(SANS) steering committees and the CM&EE forum hosted by the
Chamber of mines.
The Presidents Forum is becoming a regular event on the
calendar and issues such as Continued Professional
Development (CPD) and Identification of Work (IOW) have been
top of the agenda. This forum has also become a platform for
new associations to market their services and rally for
support such as the SA Academy of Engineering and the
Engenius campaign.
The Institution was invited to participate in a forum hosted
by the Mines Professional Associations (MPA’s) to discuss
and formulate models and guidelines on topical issues such
as CPD and the MQA qualification level for Certificated
Engineers. As President, I volunteered to represent the
Institution at this forum. A useful guideline for the
allocation of CPD points and the accreditation of course
material has subsequently been drafted and made available
for all participation parties. In terms of the MQA
qualification level, a model based on the current proposed
system has been tabled and in principle accepted by all,
however further developments are expected to take place in
the first quarter of 2007.
A workshop and information sharing session was arranged by
the Department of Education (DoE) to share with the
Voluntary Associations (VA) the newly devised vocational
qualification system which will be implemented as of January
2007. These qualifications will be aimed at level 1 to level
4 and will replace the current N1 to N3. The Engineering
Standards Generating Body (ESGB) is also hard at work
developing the level 5 and level 6 engineering qualification
which will eventually replace the N6 qualification. No doubt
there is still a lot of work to be done regarding the roll
out of these new qualifications as well as the communication
and education of the academics involved.
Numerous workshops were held by the Department of Minerals
and Energy (DME), Department of Labour (DoL) and the
Association of Mine Resident Engineers (AMRE), to discuss
the poor pass rate of the GCC candidates. Training providers
were also invited to attend these workshops and hopefully
all parties now have a better understanding of the issues
facing the GCC candidates.
Due to the numerous workshops, meetings and work commitments
I was not able to visit many of the branches during the
year. It is however disappointing to have to report that
only three of our branches hosted scheduled activities in
2006. The Council will have to investigate the decline in
activities and participation and find potential solutions to
improve the situation. At the same time I am please to
announce that the membership numbers are increasing with an
average of 5 new members every month.
A list of the committees where the members of this institute
are represented is contained in this document. I wish to
extend a word of thanks to each and everyone serving on
these and many other committees as it takes up a tremendous
amount of one’s time, and often the only remuneration is
criticism rather than praise.
Referring to the financial status of ICMEESA. The
Institution has remained cash positive and is going from
strength to strength. The audited and certified annual
financial report which is included in this annual report
clearly shows that the financial expenditure is well
controlled and a concerted effort has again gone into the
recovery of annual subscriptions. Robbie Holmwood, Honorary
Treasurer and Fiona Revolta, secretary, have both
contributed hugely to this success.
The “ICMEESA NEWS” bulletin has continued to go from
strength to strength with regular publications being created
by Robbie Holmwood. The WCB Engineering Bulletin published
by the Western Cape branch is also being circulated as
widely as possible with very interesting topics and
discussions around exam questions.
The annual year end function was held at the Queen of the
Nile Restaurant where a buffet lunch was enjoyed by all who
attended.
In closing, allow me to extend my thanks and congratulations
to a few specific people. Firstly, I would like to thank
each and everyone that assisted and supported me as
President during this past year.
Secondly, a special word of thanks to Fiona. Between raising
two sons, you are doing and excellent job in keeping the
institutions’ administrative issues up to date. Your
contribution and effort does not pass unnoticed.
Congratulations to the newly elected Council and Exco as
well as the President for 2007, Chris Schnehage and Vice
Presidents who are making themselves available for this
coming year, it will undoubtedly be just as hectic as 2006.
We should also not forget to thank the Branch Chairpersons
and their committees, who are doing an excellent job out
there by steering, counselling and guiding the Institution
and its members to enrich themselves in the knowledge of
life.
Finally, I would like to thank the members. What we do, we
do for you. Please continue communicating with us so that we
can provide the service you require.
It is extremely important for the sustainability of the
Institution as well as the Certificated Engineering
fraternity that we understand your needs.
Ladies and Gentlemen, I thank you.
 |
|
Incoming Presidents
Address - Continued Professional Development - Chris
Schnehage
Ladies and gentlemen
It is indeed an honour for me to address you this evening as
the newly elected President of ICMEESA.
My
theme for 2007 is Continued Professional Development (CPD).
The issue of CPD for engineers is still a relatively new one
and as such I believe that it is still having trouble
getting off the ground. This is borne out by the fact that
of the 173 registered persons who needed to have renewed
their registration in January 2007, only 28% applied. The
number for February was a bit higher at 34% of 271. This in
spite of a reminder having being sent out by ECSA 5 months
before due. ECSA is very concerned about this low rate and
would like to see the trend moving upwards sharply.
Additional reminders are being sent to those persons who
have omitted to submit their applications.
The reason for the low response and submissions is many
fold, but particularly in my opinion, due to two points. The
first being that registered persons have not as yet fully
understood the message about CPD and therefore not as yet
bought into the process. In this regard there is a lot of
work that needs to be done by ECSA and the various Voluntary
Associations (VAs). We need to constantly punt the idea of
CPD to our members via all the publications and
correspondence sent to members. This should also be done at
the various meetings held around the country during the
course of the year.
Review of the CPD process is as follows:
The requirement for CPD is for the re-registration of
registered persons every 5 years. In order to spread the
registration out, a 5 year table has been worked out
reflecting the initial period and the following period’s
thereafter.
|
Year
of
first
registration |
|
|
1969 |
1970 |
1971 |
| 1972 |
1973 |
1974 |
1075
|
1976 |
| 1977 |
1978 |
1979 |
1980 |
1981 |
| 1982 |
1983 |
1984 |
1985 |
1986 |
| 1987 |
1988 |
1989 |
1990 |
1991 |
| 1992 |
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
| 1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
| 2002 |
1003
|
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
| First Renewal |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
| Number of Credits |
5 |
10 |
15 |
20 |
25 |
| Second renewal |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
1016 |
For instance, using myself as an example. My initial
registration date is 21 August 1988. From the table, I need
to apply for my first renewal of registration in 2008. This
renewal would be due by 21 August, with 10 CPD points. First
submission of CPD would be within 30 days after 21 August
2007 and renewal 3 months before actual renewal date i.e. 21
May 2008.
The process is as follows: all registered persons must
record their CPD activities annually not later than 30 days
after the end of a cycle. Can be done manually or
electronically direct to ECSA, and records need to be kept
for possible audit.
I have been asked by members what must be done for CPD and
heard comments such as that “CPD has been designed primarily
for academics”. This is not true. The requirement for CPD
credits is wide and by watching out for activities, everyone
should comfortably achieve their target of 5 points per
annum.
To further the discussion on CPD requirements;
|
Category
1
(Note) |
Development
Activities |
Max
4
Credits |
40 hrs
10hr/credit |
|
Category
2 |
Work Based
• Engineering
• Mentoring |
Max
2 credits
1 credit |
800 hrs
50 hrs |
|
Category
3 |
Individual
• Membership
• Other |
Max
1 credit
3 credits |
no hrs
30 hrs |
NOTE; CPD credits must be obtained in at least 2 of the
categories, with at least 1 credit per annum from Category
Category 1 (max
of 4 credits) Attendance of structured meetings 1 credit per 10 hours
-
Conferences
-
Congresses
-
Large group workshops
-
Lectures
-
Seminars
-
Refresher courses
-
Colloquiums
-
Overseas
courses etc.
Category 2 (max of 3 credits)
Category 3
(max of 4 credits) Individual Activities
-
Membership of a VA – 1 credit
-
Lecturing, supervision, evaluation & publication of
articles– varies
-
Presentation of papers – 1 credit
-
Participation in statutory, professional committees – 1
credit / 10 hrs
-
Evaluation of programmes, qualifications, competence – 1
credit / 10 hrs
-
Post graduate degree – 5 credits
-
Self study
(journals etc) – 1 credit / 10 hrs
The second reason for lack of response by registered persons
may be attributed to the fact that there has been a slow
response taken up by suppliers, vendors, seminar presenters
etc. in recognising the potential to attract more registered
persons to attend their offerings. Maybe this is due to
their not being fully familiar with the requirement? Or
maybe we as VA’s and ECSA have not advertised / marketed the
concept of CPD requirements for registered persons to
vendors sufficiently. Some VA’s have started the process by applying the
principles of CPD to their presentations, talks and visits.
However, the attendance to such events has not increased as
yet, indicating the lack of knowledge amongst registered
persons. One should not forget the corporate companies, such as Sasol,
Eskom, Mining Houses, etc, who need to play a big part by
having their in-house training courses validated. Due to the
number of courses which they offer their staff, they should
negotiate discounted rates for having their courses
validated by selected VA’s. Furthermore, in order to make more presentations, courses,
seminars etc available to all registered persons, the
various VA’s in all regions should forge a closer
co-operation. Such working together should be easy as long
as events are planned before time and offered to all members
of cross disciplinary engineering fields. Another consideration should be that there are a number of
registered persons who do not belong to any VA and are
registered directly with ECSA. These persons need to be
brought into consideration as well. Finally, I believe that the issue which will drive
registration and requirements for CPD will be the
Identification of Engineering Work Regulations which are
reaching their final stages of completion by ECSA. These
proposed regulations are currently with the Council for the
Built Environment and Competitions Commission for
ratification. After that process these should be due for
passing by parliament by the end of 2007.
To demonstrate the point of slow new registration, the
following table taken from the ECSA Annual Report March
2006, reflects registration as at 31 March, for the four
periods preceding this report, is included.
| Registration Category |
31/03/2003
|
31/03/2004 |
31/03/2005 |
31/03/2006 |
| International
Professional Engineers |
|
9 |
15 |
19 |
|
Professionals |
|
Professional Engineers |
14,687 |
14,728 |
14,754 |
14,745 |
|
Professional Engineering Technologists |
2,357 |
2,522 |
2,617 |
2,710 |
|
Professional Certificated Engineers |
792
|
793
|
803
|
819 |
|
Professional Engineering Technicians
|
395
|
800
|
1,094 |
1,289 |
|
Candidates |
|
Candidate Engineers |
3,093 |
3,224 |
3,269 |
3,338 |
|
Candidate Engineering Technologists
|
507 |
573 |
646 |
736 |
|
Candidate Certificated Engineers
|
100 |
107 |
106 |
109 |
|
Candidate Engineering Technicians
|
563 |
699
|
833 |
973 |
The developments
will certainly be interesting to watch, however, we need to
get our act together so that we are ready to support our
members.

|
Composition of Newly Elected Office
Bearers and Council for 2007
(see Contacts
page)
 |
|
Engineering
Council of South Africa (ECSA)
On 23 & 24 February 20062005-2009 ECSA Council held the now
usual start of term of office Lekgotla. At the Lekgotla
decisions were taken which changed the previous modus
oprandi of ECSA. These included: The Council committees were
divided into High Impact and non-high impact committee; only
the chairpersons of the eight high impact committees would
serve on EXCO; the principle of representivity of
registration categories in all committees was abolished; and
role of the voluntary associations was largely ignored.
Since then the Committee Rules have been revised and in
general the number of members serving have been drastically
reduced. In the case of the Registration Committee:
Professional Certificated Engineer convincing argument has
guaranteed the retention of 4 nominees from ICMEESA
A vacancy occurred on Council with the resignation of Ms
Sharoda Rapeti and Obed Letsholo was nominated by ICMEESA .
Obed was short listed in the recommendation submitted to the
Minister of Public Works.
During 2006 Professional Certificated Engineers continued to
play a significant role in the various activities of ECSA.
Various issues which have a direct impact on the Institution
and Professional Certificated Engineers were addressed
during the year, included:
-
Continuing Professional Development (CPD)
Since 1 January 2006 all registered Professional
Certificated Engineers have to earn prescribed credits
as a prerequisite for the compulsory 5-yearly renewal of
registration which will be phased in with effect from 1
January 2007.
-
Identification of Engineering Work (IDoEW)
The Identification of Engineering Work Steering
Committee (IDoEW-SC) developed a framework for the
identification of engineering work across all categories
and disciplines of the profession and has drawn up a
proposed implementation plan. These were accepted by
Council and has been presented to the Council for he
Built Environment for approval.
-
Registration of Professional and Candidate Certificated
Engineers
The number of new registration have increase
significantly as shown in the statistic below:.
Registration Statistics
|
Period ended |
Candidate Certificated Engineer* |
Professional Certificated Engineer* |
% of Registered professionals |
|
1999 |
60 |
784 |
3.3 |
|
2000 |
74 |
791 |
3.42 |
|
2001 |
78 |
791 |
3.57 |
|
2002 |
90 |
797 |
3.57 |
|
2003 |
107 |
810 |
3.57 |
|
2004 |
106 |
816 |
4.1 |
|
2005 |
114 |
831 |
4.22 |
|
2006 |
136 |
948 |
4.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
* includes holders of certificates of competency as
electrical and mechanical engineers, marine engineers and
mine managers.
Annual fees
Consult the ECSA website:
 |
|
SAASTA
During the year various meetings were held with regards to
the future utilisation of the Observatory site.
SAASTA decided that the site will be upgraded and renovated
in 2007 with major changes been done to the various non
historic buildings.
 |
|
Department of Labor
The Chief inspector has indicated that Technical Committee
13 under the Advisory Council for Occupational Safety will
be called together again to incorporate the latest comments
received an the latest draft that was published on 9
December 2005 in Government Gazette Notice No. 28293. An
ICMEESA Council Member serves on this Technical Committee.
Cabinet approval that all sections in government
administering occupational health and safety functions be
grouped together in one statutory body has not yet gained
momentum. The two main role players will be the occupational
health and safety divisions in Department of Labour and
Department of Minerals and Energy. It will function
similarly to the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) in the
UK.
 |
|
Department of Minerals and Energy
The project that has been
ongoing to review the regulations promulgated under the Minerals Act (and in
force in terms of Schedule 4 of the Mine Health and Safety Act) and to replace
them with new, more suitable regulations under the Mine Health and Safety Act is
almost completed. With the exception of a few regulations requiring
finalisation, the project is planned for completion at the end of March 2007.
During the year 15 Mechanical and 18 Electrical Certificates of Competency were
issued to successful candidates. This represents a pass rate for Plant and Legal
Knowledge of 25,7% and 22,4%, respectively.
Of the 171 candidates who enrolled for the Plant Examination, 140 wrote the
examination, of which 36 candidates passed. The highest mark attained was 74%.
Of the 140 candidates who enrolled for the Legal Knowledge Examination, 131
wrote the examination, of which 24 candidates passed. The highest mark attained
was 86%.
The Mine Health and Safety Inspectorate continues to strive towards improvement
of conditions and practices at mines and thereby reduce the exposure of mine
employees to unacceptable levels of risk to their health and safety.
Accidents at mines:
The recorded number of persons employed at mines in South Africa increased by 10
780, from 446 555 in 2005 to 457 335.
The number of persons who were fatally injured at mines decreased from 202 in
2005 to 188 in 2006 (provisional figures for 2006). This reflects a Fatality
Rate of 0,19 persons fatally injured per million man hours worked in 2006, an
improvement in the Fatality Rate of 0,02 persons fatally injured per million man
hours worked (down from 0,21 in 2005).
The number of persons who were reportably injured at mines increased from 3966
in 2005 to 4170 in 2006 (provisional figures for 2006). This reflects an Injury
Rate of 4,09 persons seriously injured (reportable) per million man hours worked
– a regression in the Injury Rate of 0,05 persons seriously injured (reportable)
per million man hours worked (up from 4,04in 2005).
The challenges for the DME remain continued improvement in health and safety at
mines, participation on statutory tri-partite bodies, the fight against
occupational diseases and HIV/Aids (the DME is committed to the eradication of
silicosis and noise induced hearing loss in the mining sector by 2013, in line
with international milestones) and the continued development of the small mining
sector.
The DME is committed to the continuous improvement of the quality of life for
mine employees and to protect persons who may be affected by mining operations.
This is only possible with the ongoing co-operation and participation of all
persons associated with the mining industry.
The Mine Health and Safety Inspectorate Branch of the DME has undergone a
restructuring process in the head office in Pretoria. This should roll out to
the regions in due course.
 |
|
Finances
The
financial situation of ICMEESA remains sound with the
financial year of 2006 ending on a positive note.
Thank you to our members for their prompt payment of
subscriptions which, combined with good control of
expenditure by the secretary, has resulted a slight surplus
for the year.
Subscription income is our main source of income with the
only other income being interest from investments, and
income from the WP Jones Bursary Trust Fund. The financial
statements will be submitted to the auditors for
presentation at the Annual General Meeting which will be on
06 March 2007.
Bursary expenditure was R35 700. Bursary income from the WP
Jones trust fund was R34 400. Although bursary expenditure
is slightly in excess of bursary income, accumulated bursary
funds from previous years is utilised to finance the
deficit.
The operational expenditure includes a total of R28 000
which is paid to branches as a percentage of annual
subscriptions received from members of that specific branch.
This is to assist the branches with the expenditure incurred
in running branch activities.
Due to the ongoing positive response from members for prompt
subscription payment, subscription increases for 2007 have
been restricted to 4%.
RA Holmwood
Honorary
Treasurer
 |
Membership The Committee meets prior to Council and Executive meetings
to consider applications and make the appropriate
recommendations. Although there has been a positive trend in the new
membership figures for the previous 5 years, we only
recruited 47 new members for 2006. Ultimately we continue to
increase our total membership base year on year. New
applications for student members and associate members were
in the majority.
Lost members Numerous members who move around between work opportunities
fail to forward their new addresses to the Institution which
creates a list referred to as the “Lost Members” list. Mail
is returned “address unknown” and follow up via telephone is
seldom successful. With a concerted effort from the
secretary this list is continually being reduced. The
Institution would like to keep in contact with all it’s
members, subsequently we appeal to all members to remember
to keep their personal details up to date.
Obituary
JC Botma; GA Powell; TL Gibbs; JS Turner; DW Hattingh; WM
Scott; AD Jakins; C Martin; AP Mare; NL Martins
 |
Editorial
This year has seen a great improvement in communication to
our members compared with the recent past. The Vector still
stands as our “Official” journal and regular articles and
items have been placed in this journal throughout the year.
We continued with the glossy newsletter “ICMEESA NEWS” which
is distributed to all members and has reportedly been well
received. The production is of a classy finish and worthy of
keeping. Thank you to Robbie Holmwood for his efforts made
in producing these newsletters.
The web site is continually being updated and expanded,
again thanks to Robbie Holmwood.
 |
|
Bursary Awards
Both the bursars that were being sponsored by the
Institution during 2006 have delivered acceptable results
and subsequently the council agreed to continue supporting
them in 2007. Bursaries covered the costs of tuition and
books. Total cost for 2006 amounted to R35 726.
The bursary holders are:
a) Jasoda Naidoo from Chatswarth in Durban. Jasoda is
registered as a forth year student at the Universtity of KZN
studying electrical engineering.
b) Ernest De La Hunt from Rustenburg in the North West.
Ernest is registered as a third year student at Potchefstroom University studying mechanical engineering.
Both bursars are children of members of ICMEESA.
Council regretfully has to report that no prize was awarded
for a technical paper presented by a member of the
Institution this year due to a lack of nominations. This
initiative was revitalised in 2004 and a concerted effort
will be put in to find nominations for 2006.

|
|
|